Posts

One State’s Battle With DSH Cuts

Hospitals across the country are concerned about the degree to which the Affordable Care Act is reducing the Medicare disproportionate share hospital (Medicare DSH) payments that help underwrite the cost of the care they provide to uninsured patients.

Those in states that have expanded their Medicaid programs are now receiving payments for at least some of those formerly uninsured patients because those individuals are now enrolled in Medicaid. In states that did not expand their Medicaid programs, however, hospitals face challenges coming from two directions: reduced Medicare DSH payments without the benefit of some of those uninsured patients enrolling in Medicaid.

Health Care Reform/FlagThe state of Louisiana has not expanded its Medicaid program, and now, policy-makers there are faced with the question of how to finance their unexpanded Medicaid program in the face of reduced – and falling – Medicare DSH revenue.

The National Association of Urban Hospitals has long opposed the Affordable Care Act’s Medicare DSH cuts and has called on Congress to delay or repeal them.

Read more about the challenges that state faces and the role of Medicare DSH cuts in those challenges in this article from the Times-Picayune.

NAUH Talks Medicare DSH With Congressional Committee

Last week representatives of the National Association of Urban Hospitals (NAUH) met with staff of the House Ways and Means Committee’s Health Subcommittee to offer the association’s views on H.R. 3288, the Strengthening DSH and Medicare Through Subsidy Recapture and Payment Reform Act.

NAUH LogoThe bill calls for significant changes in how Medicare makes disproportionate share payments (Medicare DSH) to hospitals.

After talking to committee staff about the role Medicare DSH payments play in enabling private safety-net hospitals to serve their low-income communities, NAUH representatives expressed concern about three aspects of the proposal:

  • its call for a new, permanent, unchanging sum for allocation for the non-uncompensated care portion of the Medicare DSH pool;
  • the permanent separation of Medicare DSH payments from Medicare payments; and
  • the creation of a new, $1 billion pool of Medicare DSH funds for hospitals in states that have not expanded their Medicaid programs as authorized by the Affordable Care Act.

NAUH was invited to meet with subcommittee staff because it is one of the few groups that expressed any concern about the Medicare DSH proposal and because of the substance of its past communication with the subcommittee about Medicare payment issues, including its use of data to support its views.

Read those comments here.

NAUH Comments on Proposed Medicare Regulation (Part 2 of 4)

On April 30, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) published a 1500-page draft regulation detailing how it proposed paying hospitals for the inpatient care they provide to their Medicare patients in FY 2016 and invited comment on its proposal from stakeholders and interested parties.

On June 12, the National Association of Urban Hospitals provided its written comments in a letter to CMS. This week NAUH presents those comments in this space:

  • Yesterday: Medicare DSH
  • Today: Hospital inpatient rates
  • Tomorrow: the hospital readmissions reduction program
  • Thursday: short hospital stays and outliers

Hospital Inpatient Rates

NAUH recognizes that some of the proposed adjustments of the annual Medicare inpatient rate update are statutory requirements. Nevertheless, we are disappointed by the small increase proposed: a net of only 0.3 percent after the various adjustments.

NAUH LogoFrom the perspective of providers, Medicare is continually asking us to do more: report more data, provide care in different ways, invest in more health care information technology, and more, yet continually small increases like this one suggest that Medicare is not interested in helping to pay for any of these improvements. Urban safety-net hospitals are continually stepping up to meet these challenges and urge CMS to join us in stepping up by showing a greater willingness to share the cost of doing so.

NAUH Comments on Proposed Medicare Regulation (Part 1 of 4)

On April 30, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) published a 1500-page draft regulation detailing how it proposed paying hospitals for the inpatient care they provide to their Medicare patients in FY 2016 and invited comment on its proposal from stakeholders and interested parties.

Last week, the National Association of Urban Hospitals provided its written comments in a letter to CMS. Over the next four days NAUH presents those comments in this space:

  • Today: Medicare DSH
  • Tomorrow: Hospital inpatient rates
  • Wednesday: the hospital readmissions reduction program
  • Thursday: short hospital stays and outliers

Medicare DSH

NAUH would like to comment on three aspects of Medicare disproportionate share payments addressed in the proposed regulation: the size of the proposed FY 2016 Medicare DSH pool, the proposed methodology for distributing Medicare DSH funds, and the prospect of a meaningful increase in the number of Medicare DSH-eligible hospitals in the coming years.

The Size of the Medicare DSH Pool

NAUH is very concerned about the surprisingly large decrease in the Medicare DSH pool proposed for FY 2016. Part of this pool is predicated on a calculation of how much CMS would have paid in Medicare DSH absent the enactment of the Affordable Care Act and is then based on adjusting that figure in a number of areas, including to increase the standardized amount, the number of Medicare discharges, and changes in case mix. The final category for which an inflation factor is applied is labeled “other” and is a catch-all category for considerations such as capturing changes in Medicare payment policy since 2012, the impact of court decisions, Medicaid expansion, and others; NAUH also believes this category is the appropriate place to implement much-needed adjustments in the size of the Medicare DSH pool to reflect the growing number of hospitals becoming eligible for DSH as they serve more Medicaid patients (an issue we address below under “The Prospect of a Growing Number of Medicare DSH Hospitals”). In the FY 2015 final inpatient prospective payment system rule, this “other” factor for FY 2014 was 1.0355, which meant a 3.5 percent inflation factor attributable to this category for that year.

NAUH LogoIn the FY 2016 proposed rule, however, CMS has published a projected inflation factor for the “other” category for FY 2014 of 0.993. This significant departure from past practice accounts for a surprising $231 million reduction in available money in the uncompensated care DSH pool for FY 2016.

NAUH does not understand how the “other” factor for the same time period could change so drastically in the nine months between last August, when the final FY 2015 rule was finalized, and this April, when the proposed FY 2016 rule was proposed. For this reason, we ask CMS to provide more detailed and specific information about the various components that constitute this “other” inflation factor so we can understand why such a significant change is proposed that would have such a damaging impact on non-profit urban safety-net hospitals.

Finally, NAUH is concerned about the adequacy of the proposed Medicare DSH pool if the Supreme Court rules against the administration in the King v. Burwell case later this month. If it does, hospitals in states that used the federal exchange are likely to experience a surge in the number of uninsured patients coming through their doors – both an immediate problem for the affected hospitals and a future problem for other hospitals as well because it would almost certainly lead to changes in hospital payer mix that will increase the demand for Medicare DSH resources. NAUH hopes CMS will revisit its decision on the size of the proposed FY 2016 Medicare DSH pool if the Supreme Court rules against the administration in this case.

The Methodology for Distributing Medicare DSH Funds

NAUH is pleased that in the proposed rule, CMS acknowledges that it remains premature to propose the use of Medicare cost report worksheet S-10 for determining Factor 3 and therefore proposes continuing to employ a utilization of insured low-income patients proxy (defined as inpatient days of Medicaid patients plus inpatient days of Medicare SSI patients as defined in §412.106(b)(4) and §412.106(b)(2)(i), respectively) to determine Factor 3.

As NAUH has conveyed to you in recent years, the data from the S-10 form of the Medicare cost report that appears to be the natural foundation for such a calculation remains, in NAUH’s view, seriously flawed. The S-10 seeks to quantify the uncompensated care hospitals provide, but historically, “uncompensated care” is not a universally agreed-upon concept and hospitals have not reported their uncompensated care uniformly. Experience demonstrates that different hospitals have different, and sometimes significantly different, charity care policies, and that, in turn, affects where they report their costs on the S-10.  One hospital with a charity care policy that includes care for Medicaid patients whose stays exceeds a day limit may include that Medicaid shortfall in its charity care line on the S-10, for example, while another hospital, with a different policy, may include that shortfall in the Medicaid line of the S-10.  In this example, both hospitals are providing the same care for the same reimbursement but only one shows the shortfall as uncompensated care if payer shortfalls are not considered.  This is only one of a number of ways, including care involving Medicaid waiver populations and non-patient-specific funding streams, that NAUH believes different hospitals, even neighboring hospitals, end up categorizing and reporting uncompensated care in different ways, and hospitals in different regions and different states do the same.

In recent years NAUH’s own analysis of S-10 data has uncovered numerous instances of data reporting that raises serious questions, and our review of the most recent data finds that this continues to be the case.

Consequently, NAUH continues to believe that any use of S-10 data in its current form would pose an enormous problem. Improving the S-10 so it can be a useful tool in measuring hospitals’ uncompensated care, we believe, will require changes in the form, changes in the instructions for completing the form, and a period of auditing data submitted by hospitals to ensure that these changes are achieving their objectives.

NAUH understands that CMS is still working on this, appreciates your efforts, and welcomes the opportunity to assist in any way we can. In the meantime, we thank you for choosing a more reliable proxy for utilization by insured low-income patients instead of S-10 data and urge you to continue using this proxy until you have a better, proven, verifiable method for measuring the uncompensated care hospitals provide.

The Prospect of a Growing Number of Medicare DSH Hospitals

For urban safety-net hospitals and millions of Americans, one of the most welcome aspects of the Affordable Care Act has been its expansion of eligibility for Medicaid. This has already enabled nearly twelve million Americans to secure the access to care they had long lacked, and it appears many more will gain similar access in the coming years as even more states expand their Medicaid programs.

As more people enroll in Medicaid, hospitals are serving higher proportions of Medicaid patients and many of those hospitals will become eligible to participate in the Medicare DSH program; many, in fact, already have. As this process continues, we face the prospect of a shrinking Medicare DSH pool serving a growing number of Medicare DSH-eligible hospitals.

This prospect troubles NAUH a great deal. After all, Medicare DSH was created to help non-profit urban safety-net hospitals and others like them that face distinct challenges serving the especially large numbers of low-income residents of their communities. Those challenges may be declining in number but unquestionably remain – including significant reductions of Medicaid DSH payments beginning in 2017. The dilution of the Medicare DSH pool we can expect in the coming years – the need to divide a shrinking pool of resources among a growing number of hospitals ­– could detract from the ability of many long-time recipients of Medicare DSH, providers like urban safety-net hospitals for which the program was created, to continue meeting the needs of their communities.

To address this problem, NAUH urges CMS to consider how it might expand the Medicare DSH pool to ensure that in the coming years it reflects the addition of newly eligible hospitals. The impact of this crisis may not be great now but it soon will be, so the time to plan for it is now rather than waiting until the already-precipitous decline in Medicare DSH resources accelerates and harms vital safety-net hospitals.

Proposed FY 2016 Medicare Payment Regulation Released

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has released its proposed Medicare inpatient prospective payment system regulation for FY 2016.
law booksAmong the Medicare issues addressed in detail in the 1500-page draft regulation are:

  • inpatient payment rates
  • bundled payments
  • Medicare disproportionate share hospital payments (Medicare DSH)
  • quality reporting requirements
  • the value-based purchasing program
  • the hospital-acquired conditions program
  • the hospital readmissions reduction program
  • the two-midnight rule
  • wage index adjustments

The National Association of Urban Hospitals (NAUH) has prepared a detailed summary of the proposed regulation tailored especially to the interests of private safety-net hospitals, with a special emphasis on Medicare DSH and the hospital readmissions reduction program. To request a copy of this summary, hit the “contact us” link in the upper right-hand section of this web page.

Learn more about the proposed regulation in this CMS fact sheet and find a link to the entire proposed regulation as well.

Protect Hospitals From Medicare DSH Cuts, NAUH Asks Congress

Protect private safety-net hospitals from Medicare DSH cuts by delaying those cuts, the National Association of Urban Hospitals asked Congress yesterday.

In a message to every member of Congress, NAUH observed that the Affordable Care Act-mandated requirement to reduce Medicare disproportionate share hospital payments (Medicare DSH) in anticipation of more people getting health insurance and hospitals providing less care to the uninsured was thrown off balance by the decision of many states not to expand their Medicaid programs in the wake of the Supreme Court decision making that expansion optional.

NAUH LogoPrivate safety-net hospitals are already struggling to accommodate an outsized proportion of the $270 billion in  Medicare payment cuts imposed on hospitals in recent years, NAUH wrote.  That burden is now being exacerbated because in the absence of direction from Congress on how to adjust Medicare DSH cuts to reflect this change, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is making the cuts required in the 2010 health reform law.

NAUH asked Congress to provide that direction to CMS, which administers the Medicare program.

Private safety-net hospitals need to be protected from these cuts, which threaten to destroy their ability to care for their vulnerable patients and jeopardize the ability of some to continue fulfilling their vital role in the American health care safety net.

See NAUH’s complete message to Congress here.

Medicare Payment Rule FY 2015: Inpatient Rates to Rise 1.4 Percent

Medicare inpatient rates will increase 1.4 percent in FY 2015.

But the already-shrinking Medicare disproportionate share (Medicare DSH) pool will be $900 million smaller than proposed in April.

These and other payment policies were included in the recently unveiled Medicare inpatient prospective payment system regulation for FY 2015.

law booksThe new regulation, to be published shortly in the Federal Register, also addresses changes in Medicare’s value-based purchasing program, hospital readmissions reduction program, and outlier threshold and introduces Medicare’s new hospital-acquired conditions program and changes in hospitals’ Medicare area wage indexes.

The National Association of Urban Hospitals (NAUH) has prepared a summary of the new regulation tailored to the interests of private safety-net hospitals and can provide projections detailing the anticipated impact of all of these changes on individual private safety-net hospitals.  To receive a copy of this memo, hit the “contact us” link in the upper right-hand portion of this screen.  To see the regulation itself go here and for a Reuters report on the regulation go here.

NAUH Comments on Proposed FY 2015 Medicare Inpatient Regulation: Part 3 of 7

Every year, the Centers for Medicare & Medicare Services (CMS) publishes in the Federal Register a draft regulation describing how it proposes paying hospitals for the inpatient care they provide to their Medicare patients in the coming fiscal year.  The proposed inpatient prospective payment system regulation for FY 2015 was published on May 15, and as always, CMS invited interested parties to submit written comments.

The National Association of Urban Hospitals has always found CMS to be receptive and even responsive to its comments and therefore takes the opportunity to submit detailed comments and suggestions about the agency’s annual proposal.

NAUH is presenting excerpts from its comment letter to CMS.  The subjects and the dates they will be published are:

June 26 – the size of the Medicare DSH pool

June 27 – the manner in which CMS uses CBO estimates of changes in insurance status

Today – the methodology for distributing Medicare DSH funds

July 1 – the need for appropriate risk adjustment in the hospital readmissions reduction program

July 2 – a much-needed adjustment to the methodology employed by the hospital readmissions reduction program

July 3 – hospital inpatient rates

July 7 – short hospital stays (two-midnight rule)

NAUH’s complete comment letter to CMS can be found here.

The Methodology for Distributing Medicare DSH Funds

NAUH is pleased about the manner in which CMS has decided to measure the uncompensated care portion of hospitals’ Medicare DSH payments.  As we have conveyed to you over the past three years, the data from the S-10 data form of the Medicare cost report that appeared to be the natural foundation for such a calculation is, in NAUH’s view, seriously flawed and has not improved in recent years.

The S-10 seeks to quantify the uncompensated care that hospitals provide, but historically, “uncompensated care” is not a universally agreed-upon concept and hospitals have not reported their uncompensated care uniformly. CMS’s own consultants on how to quantify hospital uncompensated care noted that “…we found variation in how existing programs and entities define uncompensated care.”  Those definitions, the consultants noted, vary among federal programs, the states, rating and research organizations, and provider organizations.  While charity care and bad debt are always included in such definitions, they noted that “Some entities also include payment shortfalls from government-funded plans, or third party payers.”  CMS’s consultants also wrote that “Uncompensated care is most often defined as charity care plus bad debt but may include government and/or commercial payer shortfalls.” 

law booksThe use of “may” in that observation is significant:  it acknowledges that different entities interpret uncompensated care in different ways.  Different hospitals have different, and sometimes significantly different, charity care policies, and that, in turn, affects where they report their costs on the S-10.  One hospital with a charity care policy that includes care for Medicaid patients whose stays exceeds a day limit may include that Medicaid shortfall in its charity care line on the S-10, for example, while another hospital, with a different policy, may include that shortfall in the Medicaid line of the S-10.  In this example, both hospitals are providing the same care for the same reimbursement but only one shows the shortfall as uncompensated care if payer shortfalls are not considered.  This is only one of a number of ways, including care involving Medicaid waiver populations and non-patient-specific funding streams, that NAUH believes different hospitals, even neighboring hospitals, end up categorizing and reporting uncompensated care in different ways, and hospitals in different regions and different states do the same.

Numerous examples demonstrate the weakness of S-10 data and its continued unsuitability for use in the implementation of important public policy.  NAUH appreciates that CMS appears to agree through its decision to use instead what we believe to be a more tested and reliable proxy for this vital calculation:  hospitals’ Medicaid and Medicare SSI days.  On behalf of private, non-profit urban safety-net hospitals, we thank you for this decision.

While NAUH appreciates the complexity of the challenge of how best to calculate hospitals’ FY 2015 Medicare DSH payments, we also recognize that this methodology, now in its second year of use, may very well be temporary, leaving us concerned about CMS’s future intentions.  NAUH is especially interested in how S-10 data may be part of those future plans.  We continue to believe that any use of S-10 data in its current form would pose an enormous problem.  Improving the S-10, we believe, will require changes in the form, changes in the instructions for completing the form, and a period of auditing data submitted by hospitals to ensure that these changes are achieving their objectives.

NAUH understands that CMS is still working on this, appreciates your efforts, and welcomes the opportunity to assist in any way we can.  Uniformity of uncompensated care reporting, so lacking today, is absolutely essential to this process because of the manner in which the Medicare DSH pool is divided:  proportional to eligible hospitals’ uncompensated care costs.  If some hospitals report selected costs as uncompensated that other hospitals categorize differently, this could result in an unfair distribution of Medicare DSH payments.  The objective of this endeavor should be fairness in the distribution of Medicare DSH resources, and NAUH supports CMS’s decision to use a proxy for uncompensated care until it finds a way to produce the uniformity of reporting that leads to such fairness.

In the meantime, we again wish to express our thanks for CMS’s decision to use the proxy you have chosen instead of S-10 data and urge you to continue using this proxy until you have a better, proven, verifiable method for measuring the uncompensated care hospitals provide.

* * *

Tomorrow – The need for appropriate risk adjustment in the hospital readmissions reduction program

NAUH’s complete comment letter to CMS can be found here.

 

NAUH Comments on Proposed FY 2015 Medicare Inpatient Regulation: Part 2 of 7

Every year, the Centers for Medicare & Medicare Services (CMS) publishes in the Federal Register a draft regulation describing how it proposes paying hospitals for the inpatient care they provide to their Medicare patients in the coming fiscal year.  The proposed inpatient prospective payment system regulation for FY 2015 was published on May 15, and as always, CMS invited interested parties to submit written comments.

The National Association of Urban Hospitals has always found CMS to be receptive and even responsive to its comments and therefore takes the opportunity to submit detailed comments and suggestions about the agency’s annual proposal.

NAUH is presenting excerpts from its comment letter to CMS.  The subjects and the dates they will be published are:

June 26 – the size of the Medicare DSH pool

Today – the manner in which CMS uses CBO estimates of changes in insurance status

June 30 – the methodology for distributing Medicare DSH funds

July 1 – the need for appropriate risk adjustment in the hospital readmissions reduction program

July 2 – a much-needed adjustment to the methodology employed by the hospital readmissions reduction program

July 3 – hospital inpatient rates

July 7 – short hospital stays (two-midnight rule)

NAUH’s complete comment letter to CMS can be found here.

The Manner in Which CMS Uses CBO Estimates of Changes in Insurance Status

NAUH understands that CMS is required to use Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates of changes in the number of uninsured as a result of Affordable Care Act reforms to reduce the Medicare DSH pool but is concerned about the manner in which CMS uses those estimates.

NAUH LogoThe Affordable Care Act envisioned significant expansion of Medicaid in all 50 states.  The Supreme Court changed that, however, making Medicaid expansion optional for the states, and consequently, about half of the states have not expanded their Medicaid program.  As a result, reductions in the number of uninsured people are not occurring in a more or less across-the-board manner, as both the reform law and CBO anticipated, instead occurring at very different rates depending on whether individual states have or have not expanded their Medicaid programs.

Another complicating factor is the challenges the uninsured faced using health insurance exchanges to enroll in Medicaid and purchase private insurance.  The federally facilitated marketplace had a troubled launch and 27 states chose to rely solely on that marketplace; another seven operated marketplaces in partnership with the federal government.  These operations were all handicapped to a degree by the problems encountered during the initial launch of the federal marketplace.  Another 17 states operated their own exchanges – with varying degrees of success.  Some worked well but others encountered problems as great at those experienced by the federal exchange.  Whether federal or state-operated, the troubled exchanges had one thing in common:  they detracted from the number of people who obtained health insurance during the enrollment period – but they did so unevenly, with people in some states having more trouble than people in others.  Yet another complicating factor is that at this time, we cannot completely discern how many of those who enrolled in health insurance through the exchanges are newly insured and how many simply took advantage of the exchanges to obtain new insurance.

Together, these factors suggest that reducing the Medicare DSH pool based on the CBO estimates will be especially advantageous for hospitals in some states and especially harmful for hospitals in others.  For this reason, NAUH recommends that CMS reduce its planned cuts in the Medicare DSH pool so it does not needlessly create winners and losers and does not jeopardize access to care in some communities.

* * *

Monday:  The methodology for distributing Medicare DSH funds

NAUH’s complete comment letter to CMS can be found here.

 

NAUH Comments on Proposed FY 2015 Medicare Inpatient Regulation: Part 1 of 7

Every year, the Centers for Medicare & Medicare Services (CMS) publishes in the Federal Register a draft regulation describing how it proposes paying hospitals for the inpatient care they provide to their Medicare patients in the coming fiscal year.  The proposed inpatient prospective payment system regulation for FY 2015 was published on May 15, and as always, CMS invited interested parties to submit written comments.

law booksThe National Association of Urban Hospitals has always found CMS to be receptive and even responsive to its comments and therefore takes the opportunity to submit detailed comments and suggestions about the agency’s annual proposal.

Beginning today and for the next six business days, NAUH will present excerpts from its comment letter to CMS.  The subjects and the dates they will be published are:

Today – the size of the Medicare DSH pool

June 27 – the manner in which CMS uses CBO estimates of changes in insurance status

June 30 – the methodology for distributing Medicare DSH funds

July 1 – the need for appropriate risk adjustment in the hospital readmissions reduction program

July 2 – a much-needed adjustment to the methodology employed by the hospital readmissions reduction program

July 3 – hospital inpatient rates

July 7 – short hospital stays (two-midnight rule)

NAUH’s complete comment letter to CMS can be found here.

 

The Size of the Medicare DSH Pool

NAUH appreciates the work that went into CMS’s decision regarding the size of the factor 1 portion proposed Medicare DSH pool for FY 2015.  The work was thoughtful and well-researched, and we thank you for this.

For future reference, and so we can understand the underlying rationale for the decisions that were made, NAUH would like to know more about the underlying calculations that led to those decisions.  To begin, NAUH would like to know more about CMS’s decisions and calculations in light of the proposed rule’s assertion that

The Office of the Actuary uses the most recently submitted Medicare cost report data to identify current Medicare DSH payments, supplemental cost report data provided by IHS hospitals to CMS, and the most recent DSH payment adjustments provided in the IPPS Impact File, and applies inflation updates and assumptions for future changes in utilization and case-mix to estimate Medicare DSH payments for the upcoming fiscal year.

NAUH asks CMS to provide more information about the inflation updates and assumptions the Office of the Actuary used to estimate what Medicare DSH payments would have been absent section 1886(r) of the Affordable Care Act.  Although we do not know what those assumptions were, the FY 2014 final IPPS rule stated that the Office of the Actuary accounted for additional Medicare DSH expenditures associated with Medicaid expansion.  NAUH recommends that this estimate, too, should account for that impact.  Specifically, NAUH recommends that the estimate of Medicare DSH payments for the upcoming fiscal year take into account increases in Medicare DSH payment percentages that can be expected among hospitals currently projected to receive DSH as well as increased DSH expenditures attributable to hospitals that are likely to become eligible for Medicare DSH as their DSH patient percentages increase.  This calculation, NAUH believes, also should reflect the significant numbers of individuals whose applications for Medicaid are still pending – 1.7 million such people, according to published reports in early June.  NAUH would like to know whether the calculation includes these individuals and how much Medicare DSH would otherwise have been paid had they been qualified in a more timely manner.

* * *

Tomorrow:  the manner in which CMS uses CBO estimates of changes in insurance status

NAUH’s complete comment letter to CMS can be found here.